Paper to be presented at the conference on Urban Vulnerability and Network Failure, University of Salford, 29/30 April 2004.

Stranded mobility and the marginalisation of low income communities: an analysis of public service failure in the British public transport sector.

Authors: Margaret Grieco, Professor of Transport and Society, Napier University and Visiting Professor, Institute for African Development, Cornell University and Fiona Raje, Researcher, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford.

Abstract;
This paper will identify and explore the withdrawal of socially necessary public transport services from low income housing estates within the United Kingdom. Using 'stranded mobility' analysis developed in South Africa to discuss the situation of the townships, the paper will explore the interaction between land use planning and transport logics behind the development of peripheral housing estates and demonstrate how changes in planning logics and changes in the organisation of public transport finance have left the residents of these peripheral estates stranded. The changes in planning logic and transport finance as they stand constitute a network failure. The failure of transport experts and social policy analysts to identify, measure and rectify these core failures represents network failure at yet another level - a failure within the network of policy analysis. This paper builds on an existing body of work developed by the authors and extends the analysis of 'stranded mobility' presented as a keynote presentation at the International Association of Travel Behaviour Research at its meeting in Lucerne in 2003.

1. Introduction: the withdrawal of public transport

There has been a withdrawal of socially necessary transport services from low income housing areas within the United Kingdom, yet this exclusory and vulnerabilising 'policy' has received little systematic attention. The 'deregulation' of public transport in the United Kingdom has generated a context of public service failure in respect of transport services for many low income communities. Public authorities are no longer the primary providers of public transport and the fragmentation of the public transport market into profitable and non-profitable routes which accompanied commercialisation has worked against the provision of an adequate level of provision of socially necessary services. In this failing public policy context, there is no available national statistic or methodology for summarising the quality of public transport provision. Network failure largely goes unmeasured and the implications of 'stranded mobility' - the inability to access key services locally or to access mobility to key services located elsewhere - for urban vulnerability are relegated to ad hoc or individual case studies and local 'solutions'(Raje et al., 2004). An accurate and exact mapping of public transport quality and of the relationship of public transport quality to the geography of social exclusion is a necessary policy tool yet no national system for such mapping is in place. Current accessibility planning frameworks are weak (Grieco, 2003; http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/contentservertemplate/dft_index.hcst?n=8592&l;=3)and even where accessibility planning information is held it is frequently not consulted in the decision to close key local facilities: recent rounds of Post Office closures in areas with few or poor local facilities demonstrate this point (http://www.geocities.com/allinonespot/grieco/appendix1.html).

Whatever the deficiencies of the measurement of the quality of public transport in Britain, what is not in doubt is that there is a crisis in public transport provision (http://www.cfit.gov.uk/reports/psbi/cfit/). It is a crisis brought on by a lengthy policy and commercial process of attrition.

This crisis has a particularly British dimension: the way in which Britain organises its public transport services has particularly negative effects:

The overpricing of services has led to a decline in patronage: and such declines in patronage to the erosion of many socially necessary services. It is a vicious spiral and the effects of the viciousness of the spiral fall disproportionately upon the shoulders of the low income citizen. The deregulation of Britain's bus services resulted in public service network failure, new forms of urban vulnerability and produced a form of 'splintered urbanism' (Graham and Marvin, 2001) in its generation of 'stranded mobility':